Pulse/Impulse

Entries categorized as ‘Uncategorized’

Transracial adoption in the news

April 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

There was an interesting story in Newsweek last week about a black family who adopted a white girl. Newsweek posted the article, I’m sure, because this is an unusual circumstance. Most of us do not know any white children who have been adopted by people of color. I worked in child welfare/adoption field for several years and never even heard of a placement of a white child with anyone other than a white family. Of course, it’s not uncommon for children of color to be placed with white families either through international adoption or foster care.

According to a psychologist quoted in the article, “for a lot of people, not even racist people, the sight of a white child with a black parent just sets off alarm signals.” I’m not certain that I would classify someone with this type of response to the loving family described in the article as “not even racist.” That response is racist, even if it’s common. The article goes on to talk about “centuries of poisonous beliefs” that have led to the attitude that “white stewardship” of people of color is natural, but not the reverse. So, why not acknowledge that these poisonous ideas are racist and talk about them? I feel like the article included that specific quote to let (white) people who are reading, those who may admit to themselves that they would freak out a little bit if they saw a black man on the street with a cute little white girl, off the hook. It kind of says, “keep reading, we are not calling you racist.”

What I found most interesting about the article was the discussion of the practices of adoption agencies with regards to transracial adoption. According to the article:

At present, agencies that receive public funding are forbidden from taking race into account when screening potential parents. They are also banned from asking parents to reflect on their readiness to deal with race-related issues, or from requiring them to undergo sensitivity training. But a well-meaning policy intended to ensure colorblindness appears to be backfiring. According to a study published last year by the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, transracial parents are often ill equipped to raise children who are themselves unprepared for the world’s racial realities.

One adoption agency that I was associated with made prospective transracial adoptive parents reflect on race-related issues and made them sit through a “cultural diversity” training. I don’t think it was illegal. I’m not surprised, though, that a study has found white parents unprepared to raise children of other races. I found that many simply did not even know that there was anything to prepare for. A woman who was going to a adopt a girl whose biological parents were Mexican (I had nothing to do with that placement decision) told me that “I know she’s Hispanic but that’s not going to change anything about the way we live.” The family profiled in this article took steps to help their adopted daughter deal with being raised by a family of a different race, like the “Kiss Me I’m Irish” t-shirt and making sure she is in a diverse school. But many white parents seemed incapable of any acknowledgment that race was an issue they would ever need to face as parents. We would ask during the process whether parents would be willing to move if their child faced racism or discrimination in their neighborhood. A surprising number said no. I remember one woman responding with “I’ve moved around enough, I’m ready to settle down and start a family.”

So, I guess it’s not such a bad thing if, as the article suggests, Congress will be asked to include race as a consideration in adoption placements. I’m no expert on issues related to transracial parenting (I actually know nothing about any kind of parenting), but if current practices are leading to children of color being adopted by white parents who won’t even acknowledge racism in their neighborhoods or incorporate aspects of their child’s culture into their lives, then something should change.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Chinks III

April 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

All good things come in threes. Maybe a third will make the last two “Chinks” whole.

Why are we silent about the racism all around us? We don’t live in the ’50s. Our president is a mutt. He and his wife just gave Queen Elizabeth an iPod for God’s sake. We’re so new, so past that but I know I can’t be the only person experiencing racism in St. Louis, so what gives? Do we always have to write about racism in the past tense, like “Native Son” or “To Kill A Mockingbird” or “Chicago 8″? Is the topic too sensitive or are we just afraid to admit that it’s here, now, and raging?

Categories: Uncategorized

Chinks II: Food Stamps

April 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Which reminds me: I was getting a pedicure. I know, so decadent (for a poverty lawyer, teehee), but I was, in this Vietnamese joint, tiny like a hallway lined with big massage chairs. A dangerously overweight, black woman walked in. No, she lumbered in with her handbag at her side, looking tired of lumbering. Titters from the nail-doers. Manicurists, I guess. They’d noticed her too: first the weight, then the skin color. Or perhaps I’m projecting. In any case, they beckoned her to a chair, malignant smiles aglow like jack-o-lanterns, and she quietly succumbed to the growing twitters, over-generous, nonsensical verbal massaging, and I cringed. I cringed visibly. I said nothing.

They asked her if she exercised often. They asked if she had a job. For many years, she said. Yes. “Food stamps? Are you on food stamps?” they asked. No, she said quietly. She was not receiving food stamps, and had never, in her life, benefitted from food stamps.

By now, she’d noticed me staring. I was. I was staring at her – and with her- at us in these ridiculous chairs, prisoners of racists – silently. I could tell the woman picking at my toenails to give it a rest, put my shoes on, pay the bill, tell them all off and leave. Or I could sit there quietly and smile sympathetically at this dangerously overweight black woman who knew, I hoped, that I knew that I was a coward. She smiled at me.

Categories: Uncategorized

Chinks

April 2, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I got called a Chink today. The last time I remember being called a Chink, I was an 8 year-old in a fading blue one-piece swimsuit at the Boys ‘n Girls Club in Mt. Kisco, NY. In the shallow end. I don’t remember what I did to raise the hackles of Bully, a short blond chubby boy whose name’s been redacted by my neurons. All I remember is that I was dazed and confused when I first heard the word. I looked into his eyes and saw derision – I knew not of what or why – and a lonely, boiling soup of mysterious inadequacy rose in my belly.

I wasn’t angry at Bully. I just didn’t understand why he was angry with me. In an effort to understand what had just happened, I told my swimming instructor what he’d called me. I knew it was bad. Perhaps her intervention would reveal what it meant. Denise (sister to Dennis, also a swimming instructor – thank you, neurons) told me to ignore him or said something equally dismissive. I swam back into line on my back (this I remember too), trying to align my body with the rafters through puddly tears and swallowing gobs of phlegm. Maybe I felt anger then. Maybe I briefly flipped onto my stomach to catch my breath and hold in the soup that had turned into boiling bitterness. I remember it now. I can feel the same, helpless, indignant outrage or I can hold it at bay. That’s why I didn’t tell Jin that we’d been called Chinks today, in the bible-belt, by a covertible-driving Catholic School boy: me in my skirt suit with briefcase in tow (saving the poor) and she, a new J.D. with intolerance only for American fast food. I choose to feel nothing.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

A Good Week

March 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This past week, legislation was introduced in the Pennsylvania General Assembly that would extend the protections of the current anti-discrimination statute to cover lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. More info here.

The Employee Free Choice Act was introduced in Congress again and the Republicans are losing their minds. According to John McCain, EFCA is a “threat to one of the fundamentals of democracy.” EFCA would make it easier for employees to organize a union by allowing the workers, rather than the employer, to decide whether there will be secret ballot election. This is the most discussed provision in the EFCA, but it also includes another very important provision. EFCA will mandate binding arbitration when a union and an employer cannot agree on their first contract within 120 days. Most people are aware that employers bring in union-busters any time there is talk of organizing among the workers, but less well known is that 44 percent of new unions never get a first contract. When the union-busters’ intimidation tactics fail to work in the secret ballot election, they turn their attention to delaying the implementation of a contract (because after a year, another vote is required under current law). So while this provision is currently less controversial, and while the Right is gnashing its teeth over “check card,” this may end up being the provision that does the most to improve conditions for workers.

Rachel Maddow (my current girl crush) does a great job of debunking some of the lies about the “card check” provisions in EFCA.

Also this past week, we learned that there is a new ballot initiative in the works in California. Although in its very early stages, if passed, the Domestic Partnership Initiative, would overturn Proposition 8 and California would begin recognizing domestic partnerships between all couples, while marriage would be relegated to a social ceremony. I have always thought this to be a fine response to the marriage issue, but according to this article, both sides of the Proposition 8 debate hate the idea. What I really like about the idea is that it basically says to the Religious Right, much like you would say to a child “If you don’t want to share, nobody gets to play.”

I’m also very excited that Van Jones is joining the Obama administration. I saw him speak several weeks ago and he is an inspiring attorney and organizer in the environmental justice movement. Read about him.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , ,

Comment on Prop 8

March 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Here is a comment from Shannon Minter, from the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who is arguing against Proposition 8 in California.

He says in part:

“Proposition 8 jeopardizes not just the right of same-sex couples to marry, but the rights of all Californians to be treated as free and equal citizens of this state. Our Constitution is based on the principle that majorities must respect minority rights. But if a majority can change the Constitution to take away a fundamental right even from a group that is otherwise entitled to the highest level of constitutional protection, then it can take away fundamental rights from any group. Our government will have changed from one that respects minority rights to one in which the power of the majority is unlimited.”

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,

Ramblings on Lawyers and Social Justice

March 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I work for Big Labor. I don’t use that term as pejoratively as those in the right-wing business community might. I want to work for New Labor. New Labor represents the unrepresented and is, among other things, made up of workers’ centers where low-wage workers, often undocumented, go to learn about their labor rights and get assistance in asserting them. This has been my dream for years, working for or establishing something like a workers’ center. During law school, I spent some time working with immigrant workers who were not being paid, not being paid minimum wage, or otherwise being taken advantage of by their employers. This is the last time that I went to work everyday excited, that I happily took work home with me and researched labor laws on my laptop in Starbucks. I went to church on Sunday mornings to meet with members of the community and hear about their concerns. My boss had to calm my enthusiasm (and remind me of safety concerns) when I wanted to go knocking on doors looking for a lost client so we could pursue an unpaid wage claim.

I’ve recently been reminded that I am not skilled at hiding my unhappiness, my non-enthusiasm with my current position. This made me think about the things I have been telling myself, because I am someone who wants to do “labor law” yet I don’t really know if that’s true or what that means. If it means writing one more brief for the purpose of restoring the job of an underperforming public employee, it’s probably not true. I shouldn’t begrudge my employer for defending some less than deserving workers, because without the traditional labor movement, unrepresented workers would have few of the protections that they (technically) enjoy under the law today. And filing grievances over petty disputes probably does go a long way in protecting more important rights in a Collective Bargaining Agreement. And it’s the traditional labor movement that will do the heavy lifting in getting the Employee Free Choice Act, which has the potential to further expand the benefits of organizing to low-income communities, passed this year. Yet personally, I would rather be out there fighting for the little guy and I feel like those who have the protection of a union have won half the battle. So I’m glad someone is taking care of them, but I am just not passionate about playing that role.

I also wonder about the role of attorneys in poor communities in actually making a difference for that little guy. I recently heard staff from a very successful workers center speak at a conference. What I took away most from this was that the law can do nothing for communities of law wage workers, communities of color, immigrant communities, without community organizing. A staff member actually told a legal aid attorney that her organization was wasting its time on wage claims for farm workers because it couldn’t organize or represent the undocumented. So what is a lawyer to do when legal advocacy might be a waste of time if not sustained by a community of activists making other substantial changes? Many legal aid organizations don’t have the resources to do more than represent individuals with their individual problems, simply helping people keep their heads above water.

A keynote speaker at this conference said that a law degree is the degree of the 20th century, but that today the people changing the world are not lawyers. This was all very discouraging for a lawyer who has few other talents (or resources).

So who are the people changing the world today? Bloggers? Community organizers? Yogis? Social workers? Entrepreneurs? These are the people I’ve been meeting and thinking about lately. I haven’t actually resigned to the fact that lawyers cannot make these kinds of changes. I went to law school partly because I studied community organizing and watched a lawyer accomplish in a class-action settlement a victory for a poor community that could not be accomplished through organizing (we tried). I think the law is at least a part of the struggle for social justice but I’m still figuring it all out.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , ,

Nipple-Conflict Disorder

February 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Now it’s time for me to say something about Mardi Gras.

Women receive beads for showing their nipples. Men receive – wait. Men buy beer, become utterly disoriented in every way EXCEPT that they can orient themselves TOWARD drunk women who will accept beads for in-kind pay. Is Mardi Gras a controlled experiment in legal (ignored illegal) prostitution? Before you throw written sticks and stones, consider this:

Assault, rape, overzealous drinking (for the purpose of innocuating nipple-conflict pain) and all sorts of norm-blasting behavior occur around the Mardi Gras tradition. I’ll assume for now that you’ll agree that assult, rape, and drinking of the blackout-inducing category is unhealthy and indicative of maladjustment.

These unhealthy behaviors are correlated with prostitution, but at least when the exchange is honestly consummated, women receive a fungible commodity. What’s required here to adjust our society’s maladjustment? Or am I missing the point? Is the purpose of the Mardi Gras tradition to self-medicate for nipple-conflict? See “I Saw A Nipple” on Dangerous Intersection.

Maybe, deep down (or not so deep down), many Americans are attached to their nipple-conflict disorder.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Racist, Classist, Chinese Chick

February 24, 2009 · 1 Comment

I know that I’m racist. I live in St. Louis. Black men walking down my street alone after dusk in low-slung jeans scare me, so I don’t look them in the eye as they pass.

These men that I can’t look at may respond by feeling angry, nonchalant or challenged. It is hurtful to these men and to those who love them; I know because my friends share their feelings about the response to their own brothers and sons that I’m describing. I am afraid of these African American men because of the color of their skin.

To be fair, there are other factors contributing to my decision not to look this black man in the eye. They are the neighborhood that I live in (higher than average petty crime statistics), our city’s racial tension and my fear of rape coupled with a lack of any self-defense or martial arts skills. But all that is partly – or all – my fault. I moved to my neighborhood in order to “whiten” it up and show that I’m not afraid. In more politically correct terms, I moved to my neighborhood to show that I care about the social health of this inner-city hood.

Rumors of African American male bias, namely a prurient fascination with Asian women do not help to ease my anxiety about walking down the street after dusk.

African American men are not the only subjects of my bias. Nay, German men alarm me, too: especially the kind who are NOT strait-laced, who engage in easy conversation with me and do not seem ashamed of their heavy accents. The German Dude (or Gentleman, whichever you prefer), sitting next to me on this flight is wearing a heavy gold chain necklace, business-casual attire in a general ‘taupe’ theme, a rainbow-colored friendship bracelet and a notebook bound in Native American-themed brocade and leather. (“They’re crazy about Native Americans, those Germans, didn’t you know that?”)

My biases elicit reactions from my own superego: “You’re turning into a stiff old lady, girlie. You need to forget those rumors and chill the f*ck out!”

I say that German Dude (I’d be offended if he referred to me as ‘Chinese Chick,’ but not if he called me Chinese Woman) wears his notebook because it’s an accessory, just like the iPod on a jogger, the miniature poodle on a sexually extroverted blond celebrity or a blond celebrity on an aging (Jack Nicholson) actor who hasn’t been handsome since he was 35. In any case, I’m not going to engage in any conversation with German Dude on this plane, no matter how many times he unfolds his long legs so that I can take a piss or stretch my legs; no matter how polite and friendly he is toward me.

Stereotype: Germans are sex maniacs. They watch porn on their regular TVs. They watch naked news! (So do we – on network television. I’m also biased against sexuality in the marketplace because I don’t want to be objectified all the live-long day.) Let me say that again: I DO NOT WANT TO BE OBJECTIFIED ALL THE LIVE-LONG DAY. I DO NOT WANT TO SEE OTHER WOMEN, OR OTHER PEOPLE, FOR THAT MATTER, OBJECTIFIED ON THE STREET, IN THE MEDIA, OR ANYWHERE. IT CAUSES ME TO RANT. Ahem.

I’m racist. At least I can admit to being racist. Can we say that I’m racist? Even if I don’t actually believe that the stereotypes are true, I find the possibility of those stereotypes being true enough that they govern my actions. If they govern my actions, I’d say that I’m racist. Isn’t racism what causes white and whitish people to move out of cities when their housing and schools become less segregated? Isn’t it the reason that black boys in run-down cars get arrested on something – anything – if they happen to stray into a cop’s zone at the wrong time? It’s the reason that people think I must be honest, mathematically gifted and polite. What can I say? I was born with “the look.”

I’ve come close to giving my number to a black man who seemed friendly enough – and one who I’d only met a few minutes ago (I don’t even do this with white men and I don’t generally date Asians). But the rumors about African American men being selfish and requiring high maintenance (God forbid; it’s hard enough to manage my own maintenance) kept my impulses in check. That is, I didn’t even bother to think about the underlying parental racism that has prevented me from meeting many African American folks, especially men, in the first place. I just stopped in my tracks.

As kids, I met people through my parents. Then I met more people using the skills (and unconsciously, the preferences) that I learned while socializing with people chosen by my parents. Logically, racism can be passed down through generations very easily, without malice or forethought.

On the other hand, what I’ve just described is my own conscious decision. I can’t use the word “conscientious” to describe my avoidance-racism because that would turn my assumption that racism is bad on its head. No, conscientiousness has a positive connotation. One is conscientious about brushing her teeth, doing her laundry and changing her bedsheets regularly. One is not said to conscientiously avoid eye contact with strangers who happen to be African American men, unless one can safely assume that making eye contact with any stranger is bad, or that making eye contact with a stranger who happens to be an African American is bad.

Yet I would bet my left eye that many people in this City of St. Louis would say just that it is conscientious of them not to make eye contact with unfamiliar African American men. (Let’s not mention the fact that to most, African American men are utterly unfamiliar.)

One thing I know  is that the American Public has been studiously avoiding the topic of race conflict. The Doctrine of Political Correctness has even made it conscientious of us to avoid the topic of race. Our discourse – all discourse- is stunted by the Doctrine.

I’m just beginning to learn my place in the spectrum of racist disorder. Like autism, this disorder has degrees. My guess is that on the continuity of racist individuals, I’m actually sitting at the 25th percentile or lower. Maybe I think too highly of myself. I also think that Missourians have a statewide average of 90th percentile racism. Again, that’s just my guess, but anecdotally, I’d say that 90th is a conservative estimate. New York? New York has false pride. It sits at the 70th percentile. Yes, these calculations have been scientifically produced at my laptop on Open Office Writer.

There you are. I’ve found another group to be biased against – that I am biased against: Missourians. The sheer number of Missourians, white and black (there aren’t many any other coloreds), who are surprised that I speak flawless (well, native-sounding) English is astonishing. It’s flabbergasting. It’s obnoxious. These people are culturally illiterate. Even worse, they do not appear to reconsider their assumptions once I turn out to have been born here. “Well WHAT ARE YOU?” they ask. “A body-snatcher,” I want to reply. “I’m an alien life form.”

For me, awareness of such backward, nay, RUDE illiteracy translates into fear when I imagine what else Missourians would be surprised by. I’m not an expert eggroll-maker. I don’t kow-tow to all males. (I enjoyed watching The Joy Luck Club, but I also detested it for its simplification of the enormously instricate process known as Chinese-American assimilation. Why don’t we fear assimilation the way that Conservative Jews do? Alas, there lies a story for another day.)

I hear news of a Missouri State Legislator referring to the Civil War as “The War of Northern Aggression” (true story – just last week); and my white friends’ confessions of what racist white people say to them in the grocery store, having assumed that my friends, being white, are also racist. I also look around me and see white neighborhoods (clean, well-maintained, in St. Louis, anyway); and compare them to black neighborhoods in St. Louis. Littered, with boarded up homes and uncut laws, black neighborhoods are being discriminated against by their own municipal system. Some might call me a conspiracy theorist. I say, it’s like pollution, bad schools or payday lenders. We allow them to crowd into poor neighborhoods, but not white ones. How is the lack of other municipal or watchdog activities any different?

In Southern Illinois, people who refer to themselves as “white trash” or “just plan poor as all hell” are physically and psychically similar to St. Louis blacks. They’ve got a high incidence of asthma, pneumonia, lung, liver and ovarian cancer, depression, alcoholism, addiction to smoking and terrible eating habits. Sure, I’m generalizing. People living in poverty have given up hope on losing their addictions, being happy, earning a living wage, becoming healthy, losing weight, living in a home to be proud of or being culturally literate. Those who are not suffering from a complete lack of hope are suffering from the God Delusion, and trample upon those others who haven’t the same deluded sense that “God is fair.” They call on the hopeless to pull themselves up by the bootstraps by accepting Jesus into their hearts.

How do I know so much that I can speak categorically to the plight of Southern Illinois poor white folk, you ask?

I spend more waking hours with poor white folks in Southern Illinois than with any other demographic. Arguably, I spend almost as much time with my privileged, white coworkers (who all live in St. Louis), but I don’t talk to them much. They don’t share their consumption practices, their finances, familial strife, health problems, run-ins with the law (because they don’t have many, and what run-ins they have are corrected by other white lawyers, myself included).

If my coworkers do give up some information about themselves, it is controlled disclosure: image-building. My clients, on the other hand, have less control over when, why, how, and to whom they make these confessions. Theirs is a process of involuntary image-building. It will be used against them throughout their lives. It may be used against them every day.

Maybe the only group that I’m not biased against is the underdogs. My clients don’t blame me for perpetuating their miserable existence, but I do. Don’t argue with me. I may “do good work.” I may earn less than similarly qualified classmates, but I benefit from my position just as any hedge-fund manager or pimp does. I drive a Prius and buy new shoes when I’m upset, instead of falling back on meth, or into the arms of another – or the same – abusive partner, as a client might do. We’re all players. The world’s a stage. Only when someone rips the needle off the record with a decisive snatch will our dance change course.

(I want to be the one to snatch that needle. Even my coworkers, who don’t even know me that well, tell me so. Foolishness, they call it. I’d be happy if anyone else did the snatching. I just don’t see the snatching happening anytime soon. Obama may be the great white (black?) hope for many, but he’s got limited political capital. We all do.)

I’m a racist, a do-gooder with a martyr complex and an Obsessive, hoping for the public airing of racial, gender and sexual grievances. Maybe I should just become a group therapist. Maybe that’s what I started this blog to do.

Update: Just as we landed, German Dude revealed that he is in fact a Croatian socialist living in St. Louis. He’s privileged, but as a foreigner arriving in St. Louis two years ago, he was shocked by the state of our roads, schools, buildings and services. Clayton is what Eastern Europe looks like, he says. They don’t have much money, but tax dollars are funneled into infrastructure so that everybody can be proud of the town that they live in and benefit from the “wealth” of their common goods. (Homesickness perhaps, but genuinely articulated.) He cites to Sweden’s national income cap. I throw him a line about discouraging hard work. Then I describe Berlusconi’s power to let him know that I’m on his side. Socialism isn’t perfect. Berlusconi is just like our moguls. I tell him, in apology, that Americans know that “we” suck. Just look at the movie Wall-E! That was a Disney production and it did well at the theaters! Croatian Socialist Dude loved Wall-E. I’m just glad that my assumptions were not confirmed. My collection of stereotypes has been altered. Maybe it has grown, become more intricate, or maybe it’s shrinking. I think it’s hard to wander about without a box of stereotypes, though. That’s why I don’t think that 100th percentile racists should be struck by lightening. We all have the potential for disabling racist disorder.

Categories: Uncategorized